New paper highlights huge marriage divide between the social classes

,, 6/20/2016

Read the Article >>

Subject: Marriage

June 17, 2016– A new report from The Iona Institute called "Mind the Gap," shows that upper professional workers are more than twice as likely as unskilled workers to be married. The huge discrepancy shows that there are formidable social impediments to marrying if you from a socially disadvantaged group. These impediments need to be fully explored and, where possible, removed.

The figures, derived from the National Quarterly Household Survey for the fourth quarter of 2015 and provided by the CSO, show that 65.7% of upper professional workers ("Social Class A") aged 18-49 are likely to be married, compared with just 31.8% of unskilled or elementary workers ("Social Class I").

There are far more people in Social Class I versus Social Class A, (108,000 people compared with 774,000).

The report also shows that with one exception (plant and machine operatives ('Social Class H'), the likelihood of being married becomes progressively less as we move down the social classes.

A divide also exists between rural and urban areas. Looking at Census 2011 data, we find that 58.7% of adults aged 18 and over who live in rural areas were married, compared with 47% who live in urban areas.

In Cork, Dublin, and Galway, under 40% of all adults were married in 2011 and this has fallen sharply since 1986.

Commenting on the figures, Professor Patricia Casey said: "Anyone who believes in the importance of marriage should be deeply concerned about these figures. Why is it that the better off a person is, the more likely they are to be married, and the less well-off they are, the less likely they are to be married? Social disadvantage clearly diminishes a person's chances of marrying and not marrying in turn increases the odds of remaining socially disadvantaged. It is a vicious circle and it is one that obviously affects children as well.

"A US study by one of that country's most esteemed social scientists finds that if Americans married at the same rate today as in 1970, rates of poverty in that country would diminish by between 20% and 30%."

Professor Casey continued: "One factor almost certainly driving down the odds of marrying for those who are most socially disadvantaged are poorly paid, insecure jobs. People are less likely to marry if they feel financially insecure. There are also disincentives to marry built into the social welfare system. It can be more financially advantageous for two people on social welfare to remain single than to marry.

"Last year we had a big debate about the nature of marriage. Whatever our disagreements about that, those on both sides of that debate ought to be able to agree that the big marriage divide which exists between the social classes ought to be a matter of grave concern, and a matter of concern for our politicians and other policy-makers as well. It should be a matter of consistent public debate, as it is for some other issues".

The foreword to the report is written by David Blankenhorn of the Institute for American Values. David was a leading opponent of gay marriage in the US who then became a campaigner for it.

In the foreword, he draws attention to the widening marriage gap that also exists in the US, and say that all who are concerned about the future of marriage must "come together to overcome the...class divide in marriage".


Institute for American Values, 420 Lexington Avenue, Room 1706, New York, NY 10170